Birds fly by flapping wings. Planes fly with engines.
Both achieve flight, but through completely different means.
Similarly:
Humans think via complex biological processes.
AI generates responses based on data patterns.
While both produce outputs, the mechanisms are fundamentally different.
Who cares?
A bird is not a plane, a plane is not a bird, they both fly, and that is totally chill.
Founders get confused about vision. I think it's because they read too much HackerNews and too many blog posts from people who saw stages but not zero to IPO, and somewhere along the way the word "vision" got tangled up with the word "dream."
Founders ask it as a market sizing problem. Policy people ask it as a program design problem. Twenty year olds ask it with the kind of clarity that only comes from having nothing invested yet in the polite fictions: If genAI and robotics automate away most labor, what is the
“I love you” is a declaration, a headline, a headline without the article, a piece of language that points toward a reality but it does not create it. It is a prior, not a posterior. It is "cheap talk" in the game theory sense, it costs almost nothing
We only have this, the playground right in front of us. No clear evidence of any other life or meaning beyond simply being here and now. Are you attempting something ridiculous, perhaps even absurdly ambitious? Honestly, who cares? Be true to yourself, explore something new, deeply engage in creating meaning