It might seem like a paradox to say that at the core of every brilliant capitalist beats the heart of a communist. After all, capitalism and communism diametrically opposed ideologies? One champions individual enterprise and the accumulation of personal wealth, while the other advocates for the elimination of class distinctions and collective ownership of assets. Yet, if we look deeper into the motivations and ideals that drive the most successful capitalists, we find that there's often a surprising alignment with some of the foundational principles of communism.

At first glance, the assertion that a capitalist could harbor a communist heart might sound like a provocative contradiction. However, this idea stems from a place of understanding the philosophical underpinnings of both systems. Capitalism, at its best, is driven by the notion of maximizing potential—be it in productivity, innovation, or human resource. Communism, with its ideals, emphasizes the importance of a society where everyone has equal access to opportunities and resources.

The bridge here is the idealism inherent in both philosophies. Both capitalists and communists, especially in their most visionary forms, dream of creating a perfect system, a kind of utopia. For capitalists, this often translates into a world where entrepreneurial spirit and free markets lead to prosperity for all who are willing to work for it. For communists, it’s about crafting a society where equality reigns and need, not greed, drives production and distribution.

Consider the journey of a brilliant capitalist. Initially driven by personal success, many reach a point where their goals transcend personal gain. Take the likes of Bill Gates or Warren Buffett. Their latter careers and legacies are increasingly defined by their philanthropic efforts. What drives a person who has accumulated wealth beyond personal need to then give that wealth away for societal benefit? Is it not a nod to the communist ideal that resources should benefit the collective rather than the individual alone?

This philanthropic turn doesn’t erase the capitalist framework they operated within, but it does blur the lines. It shows a commitment to community and societal welfare that mirrors communist doctrine more than capitalist dogma.

In the 21st century, we also witness the rise of social entrepreneurship and ethical capitalism—concepts that challenge traditional business paradigms. Social enterprises, while operating within a capitalist framework, prioritize social impact alongside profit. This dual focus closely aligns with communist principles of serving the community and ensuring that work benefits all members of society, not just a select few.

Moreover, as capitalism matures, there's an increasing acknowledgment that for a system to be sustainable, it must incorporate elements traditionally associated with communism. This includes regulations that ensure fair wages, workers' rights, and redistribution policies like progressive taxation—all designed to protect the less fortunate in society.

In the realm of technology, where I've spent a significant part of my career, this paradox becomes even more pronounced. Tech magnates, often seen as the epitome of capitalist success with their vast personal fortunes and cutting-edge companies, are also at the forefront of advocating for radical changes in how resources are distributed. Consider the support for universal basic income (UBI) from figures like Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg. UBI is a concept that could be considered quasi-communist, as it advocates for the idea that everyone deserves to have their basic needs met, regardless of their economic contribution.

The relationship between capitalism and communism is complex and nuanced. While the two are often presented as stark opposites, in the hearts and minds of those who drive these economic engines, the distinctions can sometimes blur. The visionary capitalist, who begins by harnessing personal and corporate growth, often evolves towards a broader concern for societal welfare, reflecting core communist values.

It's essential to recognize that these alignments are not about diminishing the distinctions between these systems or suggesting they are fundamentally the same. Instead, it’s about acknowledging that the pursuit of a fair, equitable, and thriving society is a common thread that can unite even the seemingly most disparate of ideologies. Perhaps in every brilliant capitalist's journey, there is a moment, a turning point, where they gaze into the heart of their ambitions and see a reflection that looks remarkably communist. And maybe, just maybe, this isn't a contradiction but a profound insight into the complexity of human motivation and societal progress.

Society is about to enter an era of the most rapid change in technology we've ever seen, ever. The change will be tetration, there is no choice but to accept flexibility.

With love. :)